Design puts Vancouver ahead of Seattle

IMG_1990City Tank recently reported on how the Vancouver region’s focus on density and transit has allowed it to succeed. The post basically points out even the “suburbs” of Vancouver are dense and transit oriented. Pictures in the post of Burnaby really do look like they could be showing downtown Vancouver.

The post concludes with this salient point:

Imagine that instead of a huge surface parking lot and some scattered low-rise apartments and strip malls, there were half a dozen high-rise towers clustered around the Sound Transit LINK light rail station in Tukwila. That’s the difference between how the greater Vancouver region does things, and how the greater Seattle region does things.

And it’s why greater Vancouver will continue to be a more sustainable region for decades to come.

And I think that’s the key. Seattle is a great place that I love and that has excelled in many ways. But Vancouver, just a short distance away, has pulled ahead by building better. Moreover, that outcome wasn’t automatic or foregone; it was a decision people made because they wanted to have a better, more successful city.

There’s an obvious lesson in this for cities along Utah’s Wasatch Front: the benefits of growth will vary in magnitude depending on the type of city we built to handle that growth.

Advertisement

One comment

  1. Aaron Guile

    I agree with your final paragraph. Vancouver’s basic design philosophy will work great for the Wasatch Front . . . the trick now will be to get people out of their cars and make Trax and the UTA cheaper.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s